Thorpy |
16 Feb 20 01:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
(Post 14290374)
My personal opinion is to do them before you commit any serious money to a holiday that's not recoverable in the unlikely event that your application is refused. Secondly as sha9 suggests maybe 6 months in advance in case there's a refusal needing to apply for a visa.
The chance of refusal is so slight as maybe not measurable but over all my years on here since they were introduced I have seen it happen.
Once by a massive software fail at SFB but more commonly by applicant's carelessness.
We've had live ESTAs since they were introduced and honestly wouldn't risk losing a holiday for trying to optimise lots of uses out of a £10 document.
Mick
|
After lots of people have asked the question and lots of debates around it, people have got good at summarising. This is a good summary, especially in the description of the chance of refusal for someone normal. The other posts back it up nicely.
Maximising the chances of a "free" trip is something which seems a good idea, but in my mind when you look properly isn't. If you get your ESTA 6 months ahead of your planned trip, you give yourself time to get a VISA if you need one, and you still have 18 months when you get back to use it again if all goes normally. If you did ESTA last minute, that 18 months extends to maybe 23 months, but if you do need a visa, you haven't got time to sort one. Whilst the odds of needing a VISA are indeed very small, the consequence is catastrophic. You are risking the first holiday for the possibility of saving a tenner should you decide to go between 18-23 months after you get back. To me not worth it, like lumping your house on a strong odds on favourite so you can win next to nothing.
|