[Tretinker]

Originally Posted by Nimbus

Free dining clearly is a "perk". Perks are booking incentives. Just as all the onsite benefits are "perks" and exist to entice people to pay more money to stay onsite.

It is a more significant perk, with an obvious monetary value, than the others but it is still a perk and booking incentive.

I wouldn't say removing it is unreasonable. They are plenty of people who book a stay at a Disney hotel and pay rack rate without the free dining. Clearly, people who did have free dining are very unhappy with its removal, which is understandable (I am one of them). Mind you, people get unhappy about a lot of things. That doesn't mean they are entitled to anything to replace that free booking incentive.

I would like a discount to make up for the lack of free dining. I do not feel entitled to receive a discount for the lack of free dining.

See more...

This is bonkers

So if you sign up for a phone contract with 'free' phone you'd be fine if they then turned around and told you actually you aren't getting the phone after all. I mean there are plenty of people that pay more for the same phone so why not? I mean you would like the phone but your not entitled to it right?