|
General Chat This forum is for general topics and chat type threads. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
12 Mar 19, 08:03 AM |
#21
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Mar 16
|
|
12 Mar 19, 08:08 AM |
#22
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Mar 02
|
I think it's premature to dismiss the Lion Air crash as purely pilot error. I'm by no means an expert, but reading up on the incident it looks like Boeing and the FAA have some questions to answer.
Boeing fitted new anti-stall software, maneuvering characteristics augmentation system (MCAS), to the new aircraft because the positioning of the new, heavier engines makes the aircraft more prone to stalling. However they, and the FAA, determined that because the plane was so close in type to previous 737 models pilots did not need to be informed about the changes and did not need extensive retraining, including simulator time. This NYT article highlights the issue... nytimes/2019/02/03/w...sh-pilots.html The Ethiopian Airlines aircraft seems to have exhibited the same erratic flight pattern as the Lion Air crash, although it's obviously far too early to draw any conclusions from that. |
12 Mar 19, 08:27 AM |
#23
|
Imagineer
Join Date: May 10
|
Yes I do agree, I think pilot error covers a lot of things including lack of training and experience. I have read a lot of articles including one that states that this is the only aircraft with one particular set of switches which I think (don’t quote me as I am not an aviation expert) are the only set which are down when they are off unlike any other Boeing aircraft.
It’s a difficult subject. |
12 Mar 19, 08:55 AM |
#24
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Jan 08
|
I don’t think it is accurate to say the Lion Air crash was due to pilot error. The final report hasn’t been published but the preliminary report published in November has referenced several potential factors and how they interlink. As usual with plane crashes, it’s complicated and rarely down to a single factor.
I know very little about such things but investigation reports refer to faulty sensors (angle of and attack and air speed) one of which was changed prior to the previous flight. The pilot of the the previous flight experienced similar issues with automatic systems potentially responding to faulty sensors and pushing the aircraft’s nose down. The pilot managed to control the aircraft on that occasion but was sufficiently concerned to declare ‘pan pan’ which is the level of alert just below Mayday. Interestingly, the Indonesian authorities have declared that the plane was not airworthy on the flight prior to the crash. The increasing number of airlines voluntarily grounding the Max aircraft gives significant cause for concern. |
12 Mar 19, 08:56 AM |
#25
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Mar 12
|
Boeing are issuing a software update
uk.reuters/article/uk-et...-idUKKBN1QT055 and telegraph/news/201...-ground-plane/ |
12 Mar 19, 09:04 AM |
#26
|
Guest
|
Mmm. Will be interesting what approach the operating remaining airlines do with thier Max 8s before the software upgrade.
I appreciate Boeing are not directly relating this to the recent tragic events. However, as a passenger I wouldn't be happy to drive around in a car that had a recognised and necessary design / safety upgrade offered by the manufacturer and, more importantly mandated, by the governing safety body, until it was done. I feel even more hesitant to go in an aircraft with a software problem esp if it was something like anti-stall, altitude control issues which seems to be the current rumour. The risks are too great, for operating companies, apparently for airport's, and potentially for passengers for using them in the interim I would have thought. Edited at 09:08 AM. |
12 Mar 19, 09:07 AM |
#27
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Jan 08
|
|
12 Mar 19, 09:36 AM |
#28
|
|
Imagineer
Join Date: Sep 14
|
||
|
12 Mar 19, 10:49 AM |
#29
|
|
Very Serious Dibber
Join Date: Feb 14
Location: Sheffield
|
"What's more, Boeing issued a bulletin after the Indonesian accident alerting pilots that the plane might initiate a dive on its own and reminding them that a pair of switches in the cockpit can disable the motor that pushes the nose down."
Sorry, but if Boeing know that there is a potential flaw with the systems causing the plane to dive, and still haven't grounded them then I am not flying on this model in May. I'd rather lose the money (which is not that much to be honest as it's a package holiday split between 10 of us) than potentially fly in an unsafe plane.
__________________
DLP - 2001, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017 WDW - 2018, 2023 |
|
|
12 Mar 19, 12:24 PM |
#30
|
|
Thread Starter
Imagineer
|
if you have an interest reading about stuff like this, follow the threads on airliners.net
airliners/forum/viewforum.php?f=3
__________________
Las Vegas 18 - Florida 18 -Holland 18 -Bratislava 18 -Florida 17 -Holland 17 -Rhodes 17 - Kos 17 - France 16-Belgium 16-Holland 16-Germany 16-Sopot Poland 15-Kos 15-DLP SQL 15-Hampton Lakes 14-Hamburg 14- Berlin 13-WestRidge Villas 12-Krakow 12-France 11-Turkey 11-Germany 10-Marbella 10-Jamaica 09-Dublin 09-Dublin 08-Paris 08-Zante Villa 08-Egypt 2008-Rhodes 2008-Sweden 08-Norway 08-Rhodes 07- Huatulco Mexico 07-DLP Magic Circus 2007-Dublin 2007-Sweden 07-Greece 06/05/04-Barcelona 04-Rhodes 02 |
|
|
|
DIBB Savings |
AttractionTickets.com
Get £10 off each Disney Ticket with the code ATDIBB10 Get up to £50 off per room at Disney or Universal with the code DIBBHOTELS |
theDIBB Blog |
Guests can book their 2025 Hotel and Ticket package early to enjoy Free Dining &... Read More »
The iconic 1900 Park Fare restaurant is opening its doors once again at Disney’s Grand... Read More »
One of the the five worlds found in Epic Universe, How to Train Your Dragon... Read More »
|
theDIBB Menu |
Exchange Rates |
US Dollar Rates
Euro Rates |
DIBB Premium Membership |
Did you know you can help support theDIBB with Premium Membership? Check out this link for more information and benefits, such as... "No adverts on theDIBB Forums" Upgrade Now |